Search Network:

« Bill Gates head-to-head with John Stewart! | Main | I'll have a Google to start, followed by a Corona with a Bacardi chaser! »

Jan27
Do people who do "Second Life" need to get a real life?

I posted a few days ago about the “Second Life” phenomenon and got some pretty interesting emails as a result of it. I have to be honest; this whole social networking thing is a bit of a mystery to me. Not that I don’t understand what is going on, I think I do… What I don’t understand is … Why? Whether it be teens on MySpace, Nihilistic gamers spending their lives on MMORPG’s (Massively Multiplayer Online Role Player Games) or people simply pretending to be someone else on Second Life…  When I read that teens are spending more than 45 hours a week with media, including television, the Internet, iPods, movies, cell phones and video games. And, that that is more time than they spend with their parents or in school. Then I have to wonder where we’ll be in ten or twenty years. Will we all be hunkered down in front of our multi-media-personal-interactive-relationship-module? Will we ever need to change out of our pajamas? Will we have solved global warming because no one will ever think of leaving their MMPIRM? How you will make a living and support yourself is beyond me… Unless you can find a way to live on Linden dollars.  

money344.jpg

.

.

Forget Linden... I'll take the real thing. Thanks.

 

related entries


3 Comments/Trackbacks




You should talk to Ansche Chung about that whole "living on linden dollars" thing.

People who watch or play sports should "get a real life."

People who watch or create fictional movies should "get a real life."

People make or enjoy small talk should "get a real life."

People who weightlift or exercise should "get a real life."

And finally, people who do not spend every waking hour of their lives working toward "solving global warming" should "get a real life."

Let's face it, the reality is there is no manual for life's existence. There is no such thing as "getting a real life" because there is no actual, truistic meaning of a "real life" or what "getting" one actually entails.

Once global warming is solved, then what? You have a greater possibility of more humans and healthier lives to be born to do ... what? Same with world hunger. And world peace.

Have you ever considered that by your logic, once global warming is solved and all of the world's other problems are solved (presumably that's where you're going with it) by people with "real lives," there would simply be more time to have "fake lives," (as it were) as there wouldn't be any more problems to solve and everyone could just "waste" their lives away, care free? You would then have simply defeated the entire purpose of your goal of having everyone get "real lives."

Let me take this another direction, it appears that you think the goal is to extend lives, but perhaps getting a "real life" actually means doing to things to help kill off the human race and die younger. Without humans in first place, there would be no hunger, no war, and no reason to worry about global warming. Once everyone is gone, there would at least then be no such thing as a "real life" for anyone to "fake," so this scenario is even better for than your apparent proposal because, as I explained previously, the end goal doesn't result in the entire care free human race "wasting" their lives.

The point is that in reality, there is no life manual, and therefore, no real such thing as a "real life" for people to get. Such a concept exists only in your mind, a place in which, by your expressions here, I certainly don't want to live.

Anonymous...
All I can say is... Woah!!! Very Keanu Reeves there. I am not suggesting anyone solve any problem, whether it be global warming or world hunger. It's just that I have recieved emails from people who's partners have ruined their relationships and their own lives because they have become obsessed with non-existent environments. Environments that exist for people to be someone other than who they really are. When I say "get a life" perhaps I should say "reclaim your life."
Cheers/George

submit a trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:

post a comment

Name, Email Address, and URL are not required fields.





Comment Preview

« Bill Gates head-to-head with John Stewart! | Main | I'll have a Google to start, followed by a Corona with a Bacardi chaser! »

Advertise

recent comments

    sponsored ads



    subscribe


    Prefer Email?
    Subscribe below-

    Enter your Email:


    Powered by FeedBlitz What's this?

    Current News

    Support This Blog

    blogroll



    Available to order at Amazon
    My site was nominated for Best Marketing Blog!

    business social media

    Use these fast growing business social media sites to promote your business, feature your products, spotlight your business leaders, create links, and drive traffic back to your company site, all for free!

    BIZZlogos - Add your logo - free link to your site
    BIZZphotos - Add photos of your products and people
    BIZZprofiles - Submit your profile and build your online visibility
    BIZZspotlight - Spotlight your business with free links
    BIZZvideos - Videos about businesses, products and business people.
    BIZZbites - "Digg" for Business - Submit your articles and posts

    Advertising / Branding

    know more media network

    View Network Map

    Network Feed List (OPML)

    Know More Media Network
    Feed


    we support unitus

    PRWeb

    Influencer



    AdHurl is a member of the Know More Media network of business related blogs.

    Here are some current headlines from some of our business publications:

    ProductivityGoal

    CallCenterScript

    AdHurl

    TheBizofKnowledge

    LandingTheDeal

    CustomersAreAlways

    HealthCareVox

    BrainBasedBusiness

    TheInsurancePolicy

    MarketingBlurb