Search Network:

« Are video games safer than swimming? | Main | You can have any book you want... As long as it's from Amazon! »

Mar31
Is the anonymity of the Internet about to become a thing of the past?

The anonymity of online communications is a big attraction for many people - and not just those who are up to no good. For many folks, the 'Net has long served as a place where they can interact with others without revealing anything personal. Or, as the famous New Yorker cartoon put it: "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog." Many law enforcement agencies want to do away with anonymity on the Internet. They claim it makes it more difficult to identify criminals. Legislation has been proposed that would require all Internet traffic to include the identity of the person originating it. The CAN SPAM Act passed by the U.S. Congress in 2003 makes it illegal for commercial email messages to use false or misleading identifying information. Meanwhile, privacy advocates favor protections for those who practice anonymity on the 'Net. The ACLU has lobbied against requirements for ISP's to reveal the identities of their subscribers and see anonymity as a First Amendment issue. So, what do you think? Is it an idea whose time has passed, or is the ability to conceal your identity more important now than ever in these identity theft prone days?

Internet%20dog%202.JPG

.

It's still very funny, and true!

 


13 Comments/Trackbacks




Maybe online anonymity should be a thing of the past. Consider this case:

A journalist named Mary Spicuzza, distraught because her sister Jeanne Marie Spicuzza was roughed up online at Wikipedia, went after the guy that did it and tried to unmask him in a newspaper article she wrote for a San Francisco newspaper called the SF Weekly.

Unfortunately for her and for all of us who believe that online anonymity is a frace, she had to resign from her newspaper after writing the story for violating "journalistic ethics." Nevertheless, it was a valient effort on her part, especially in light of the fact that her sister was mentally ill. Can you imagine attacking a mentally ill person, anonymously or otherwise.

You can read about it here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive372 (scroll to "Tawdry Tabloid Journalist")

An Open Letter to the Wikimedia Foundation

To Whom It May Concern:

I do not participate on Wikipedia, nor do I use it as a source. I am none of the persons I am being accused of and do not suffer from Dissociative Identity Disorder, formerly known as MPD. My attorney, Richard Rosenthal, has been supplied with these facts along with a request that all false claims, slanderous remarks and defaming content concerning me be removed promptly from the site. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Jeanne Marie Spicuzza

Comment by Jeanne Marie Spicuzza — February 13, 2008 @ 04:04PM


I edited this story and I can assure you that Mary did not get fired for this story or any other. Mary decided to leave the paper to take a job with a local documentary filmmaker. She gave her notice before the Wikipedia story was published. She disclosed to me early in the reporting process her sister's fights with Griot and her sister's role is mentioned high up in our story. Bottom line: We stand by the story.

Comment by Will Harper, Managing Editor, SF Weekly — February 26, 2008 @ 01:55PM

User:Griot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser confirms that this user has used one or more accounts abusively.
The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended.
See block log • confirmed accounts • suspected socks • Checkuser request
Categories: Wikipedia sockpuppeteers

Well, I'm afraid not. The journalist was asked to leave her position -- told to "clean out her desk by the end of the day."

Frankly, I think it's terrible unfair. Mary Spicuzza should still be pursuing her excellent journalism practice. I guess she tread on the toes of someone important, but we should all cheer her for trying.

I edited this story and I can assure you that Mary did not get fired for this story or any other. Mary decided to leave the paper to take a job with a local documentary filmmaker. She gave her notice before the Wikipedia story was published. She disclosed to me early in the reporting process her sister's fights with Griot and her sister's role is mentioned high up in our story. Bottom line: We stand by the story.

Comment by Will Harper, Managing Editor, SF Weekly — February 26, 2008 @ 01:55PM

Interesting. We recently studied the Mary Spicuzza/Wikipedia case in our journalism class. I personally think bending traditional journalism ethical rules in the persuit of a good story isn't necessarily bad, but my professor was adament that Mary Spicuzza had done the wrong thing by using her newspaper's resources in the service of what she thought was a personal matter (apparently the Spicuzza family had some kind of longstanding vendetta against the Wikipedia editor). Anyhow, this is becoming a textbook case of journalistic ethics.

Marc Salomon

User:Griot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
• Learn more about using Wikipedia for research •
This user has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser confirms that this user has used one or more accounts abusively.
The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended.
See block log • confirmed accounts • suspected socks • Checkuser request
Categories: Wikipedia sockpuppeteers

Wow, it would be great to get the specifs on that alleged class and it's alleged professor, Savoy.

What is the best way to contact the owner of this blog?

Anonymous... Commenting today.
You can email me at...
georgeeeparker@msn.com
Cheers/George

An "alleged" professor. Events can be "alleged" but not people -- we learned that in my journalism class.

Yes, the professor was quite adament about Mary Spicuzza violating traditional journalism standards, and he used her as example of how the profession is being denigrated by those who practice it, and how upcoming journalists should try to stick to the old standards for the sake of the profession. This Mary Spicuzza person is apparantly a pariah in journalism and can no longer get a job.

In my existential philosophy class, we talked about how Savoy is alleged. A textbook case, the professor said.

submit a trackback

TrackBack URL for this entry:

post a comment

Name, Email Address, and URL are not required fields.





Comment Preview

« Are video games safer than swimming? | Main | You can have any book you want... As long as it's from Amazon! »

Advertise

sponsored ads



Incredible Hall of Acclaim.

subscribe


Prefer Email?
Subscribe below-

Enter your Email:


Powered by FeedBlitz What's this?

Current News

Support This Blog


Available to order at Amazon
My site was nominated for Best Marketing Blog!

business social media

Use these fast growing business social media sites to promote your business, feature your products, spotlight your business leaders, create links, and drive traffic back to your company site, all for free!

BIZZlogos - Add your logo - free link to your site
BIZZphotos - Add photos of your products and people
BIZZprofiles - Submit your profile and build your online visibility
BIZZspotlight - Spotlight your business with free links
BIZZvideos - Videos about businesses, products and business people.
BIZZbites - "Digg" for Business - Submit your articles and posts

know more media network

View Network Map

Network Feed List (OPML)

Know More Media Network
Feed


we support unitus

PRWeb

Influencer



AdHurl is a member of the Know More Media network of business related blogs.

Here are some current headlines from some of our business publications:

ProductivityGoal

CallCenterScript

AdHurl

TheBizofKnowledge

LandingTheDeal

CustomersAreAlways

HealthCareVox

WebMetricsGuru

TheInsurancePolicy

MarketingBlurb